Difficult to obtain decisions of general public importance
10 May 2016
Two judgments delivered by the Danish Supreme Court show that it is difficult to make decisions of general public importance in the area covered by the Danish Marketing Practices Act.
Søren Stenderup Jensen, Attorney-at-Law and Plesner Partner, has written an article about two Supreme Court judgments (U 2015.2565 H and U 2015.3331 H) in the Danish law journal "Erhvervsjuridisk Tidsskrift" No 2 - May 2016.
Both judgments consider the documentation requirements in section 3(3) of the Danish Marketing Practices Act, and the decisions point in different directions. The two decisions show how difficult it is to obtain decisions of general public importance when it comes to marketing rules.
Read the whole article (in Danish) "Dokumentation, sandsynliggørelse eller indikation?" (in English: documentation, probability or indication?)
Both judgments consider the documentation requirements in section 3(3) of the Danish Marketing Practices Act, and the decisions point in different directions. The two decisions show how difficult it is to obtain decisions of general public importance when it comes to marketing rules.
Read the whole article (in Danish) "Dokumentation, sandsynliggørelse eller indikation?" (in English: documentation, probability or indication?)